Design and Construction

The frames of both the Kawasaki Mule and Teryx UTV models are designed to provide exceptional durability and stability. The Mule’s frame is constructed from high-tensile steel, which offers excellent strength-to-weight ratio. Its reinforced structure enables it to withstand heavy loads and harsh terrain, making it an ideal choice for work-oriented applications.

In contrast, the Teryx’s frame is built with a lightweight yet robust design, featuring a combination of aluminum and steel materials. This allows for improved maneuverability and agility, making it better suited for recreational use.

Both models feature independent double-wishbone suspension systems, which provide a smooth ride and excellent handling capabilities. The Mule’s suspension is designed to handle heavier loads, while the Teryx’s system prioritizes responsiveness and agility.

The wheelbases of both models vary slightly, with the Mule measuring 2,100 mm (82.7 in) and the Teryx measuring 1,900 mm (74.8 in). This difference affects their turning radius and overall stability, with the Mule being more suitable for heavy-duty tasks and the Teryx better suited for tight trails and corners.

Overall, both models’ frames and suspension systems are designed to provide a unique set of benefits that cater to their respective applications.

Engine Performance

The engine performance specifications of both the Kawasaki Mule and Teryx UTV models are crucial factors that contribute to their overall power and agility. The Mule 1000i-4 LE model is equipped with a 993cc, V-twin engine that produces 37 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 41 lb-ft of torque at 3,500 rpm. This combination provides a smooth and reliable power delivery, making it suitable for various tasks such as hauling and towing.

In contrast, the Teryx 750 4x4 model is powered by a 749cc, V-twin engine that produces 48 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 50 lb-ft of torque at 3,500 rpm. This more powerful engine provides faster acceleration and better hill climbing ability, making it suitable for more demanding tasks such as rock crawling.

The transmission type also plays a significant role in the overall performance of these UTVs. The Mule features a continuously variable transmission (CVT) that provides a seamless shifting experience, while the Teryx features a centrifugal clutch automatic transmission (CCAT) that provides a more traditional feel with distinct gear shifts. Overall, the engine performance specifications of both models demonstrate their unique strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different applications and user preferences.

Towing Capacity and Payload

When it comes to hauling heavy loads, towing trailers, and carrying passengers, the Kawasaki Mule and Teryx UTV models offer different capabilities that set them apart from one another. The Mule 4010 and Mule Pro FXT have a combined towing capacity of up to 2,000 pounds, making them suitable for light-duty tasks such as hauling small trailers or equipment around farm fields.

In contrast, the Teryx series boasts a higher towing capacity, with the Teryx4 reaching up to 1,500 pounds and the Teryx S reaching an impressive 2,200 pounds. This increased capacity makes the Teryx models more suitable for tasks that require heavier loads, such as hauling larger trailers or equipment.

Payload-wise, both the Mule and Teryx series offer generous capacities, with the Mule Pro FXT capable of carrying up to 1,000 pounds in its bed. The Teryx4, on the other hand, can carry up to 800 pounds, while the Teryx S can haul a maximum of 900 pounds.

When it comes to choosing between these models for specific applications, such as farming or recreational activities, their towing and payload capacities play a significant role. For instance, farmers may prefer the Mule Pro FXT for tasks that require hauling small equipment or supplies around the farm, while the Teryx series may be better suited for more demanding tasks that require heavier loads.

In summary, the Kawasaki Mule and Teryx UTV models offer distinct capabilities in terms of towing capacity and payload ratings. While the Mule Pro FXT excels in light-duty tasks, the Teryx series is better suited for heavier loads and more demanding applications.

Off-Road Capability

Both the Kawasaki Mule and Teryx UTV models are designed to tackle challenging terrain, but how do they fare when it comes to off-road performance? Let’s dive in.

Ground Clearance

The Mule boasts a respectable 11 inches (27.9 cm) of ground clearance, while the Teryx UTV model has an impressive 12.5 inches (31.8 cm). The extra inch on the Teryx provides better protection against rocks and other obstacles, allowing it to navigate rough terrain with greater ease.

Approach and Departure Angles

The Mule’s approach angle is a respectable 32 degrees, while its departure angle is 24 degrees. In contrast, the Teryx UTV model has an approach angle of 35 degrees and a departure angle of 27 degrees. The steeper angles on the Teryx enable it to climb steeper inclines and navigate tighter trails with greater confidence.

Four-Wheel-Drive Systems

Both models feature four-wheel-drive systems, but they differ in their implementation. The Mule’s system is designed for smoother, more stable operation at low speeds, making it well-suited for work applications like farming or construction. In contrast, the Teryx UTV model’s system is designed for high-speed off-roading, providing better traction and control when carving up trails.

When it comes to handling challenging terrain, the Teryx UTV model has a slight edge due to its superior ground clearance and steeper approach and departure angles. However, the Mule’s four-wheel-drive system provides greater stability at low speeds, making it a more suitable choice for work applications that require precision and control.

Practicality and Versatility

When it comes to practicality and versatility, both the Kawasaki Mule and Teryx UTV models deliver. The Mule offers a spacious bed space of 1,500 pounds, making it perfect for hauling large equipment or supplies. Additionally, its cargo capacity is impressive, with a maximum payload of 2,000 pounds. In contrast, the Teryx has a slightly smaller bed space of 1,200 pounds, but still provides ample room for storing gear and equipment. Its cargo capacity maxes out at 1,800 pounds, which is still respectable considering its smaller size.

Both models offer a range of accessory options to enhance their practicality. The Mule can be fitted with a variety of attachments, including winches, plows, and trailers, making it suitable for heavy-duty work. The Teryx, on the other hand, has a more limited selection of accessories, but still offers items like a roof rack and cargo box.

While both models have their strengths in terms of practicality and versatility, the Mule’s larger bed space and heavier payload capacity give it an edge in this department. However, the Teryx’s smaller size and lighter weight make it more agile and easier to maneuver in tight spaces, which can be a major advantage for some users.

In conclusion, while both the Kawasaki Mule and Teryx UTV models share some similarities, they also have distinct features that set them apart. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right model for your needs and preferences. Whether you’re looking for a reliable work vehicle or a fun recreational ride, one of these two options is sure to meet your expectations.